humanespot.org humanespot.org humanespot.org
 
 

Animal Advocacy

 

It's the (Animal) Economy, Stupid

| |
This past weekend I was one of the presenters at "Speaking Their Truth," the 23rd Annual International Compassionate Living Festival. The topic was economics as it applies to animal protection campaigns, and our panel covered a range of different issues relevant to economic matters. Here is a summary of my part of the presentation, which touched on capitalism, current global trends in animal consumption, and using economic data to measure the success of programs and campaigns for animals.

Achieving Breakthrough Performance

|
by
Great organizations have one thing in common: great managers. In this article from the Stanford Social Innovation Review, some effective managers share four simple management principles that they use to guide organizations from mere mediocrity to stand-out stardom.

How to Quantify Animal Suffering

| |
In my last post, I asked whether or not it's presumptuous for animal advocates (who are most often human) to attempt to quantify suffering for different species and animals in diverse situations. It may seem reasonable to generalize that mammals are more capable of suffering than insects, for instance, although some people would argue the point. Getting more specific than that, like by suggesting that "battery hens" suffer more than shelter animals, would certainly generate more controversy. So, can we quantify animal suffering?

Nonprofits Must Invest in Human Capital

|
by
A report from the Nonprofit Listening Post Project at Johns Hopkins University theorizes that nonprofits can be more effective at recruiting and retaining staff, particularly from among "Millennials" born between 1982 and 2002 and Baby Boomers born between 1946 and 1964.

Defining Our Goals as a Movement

|
In my last post, I wrote that "the essential goal of the animal protection movement is to eliminate animal suffering or, in more realistic terms, to reduce animal suffering as much as possible." While I think most advocates would agree with that goal, some would argue that anything short of total elimination of animal suffering would be a failure. However, one thing I think we can probably all agree on is that it will become increasingly important to define our overall goals as a movement, even if we don't agree on the specifics.

What Will Things Look Like in 10 Years?

| | | | | |
As I was organizing some old files the other day, I came upon a 10-year vision statement for the animal protection movement, which I wrote for a meeting a couple of years ago. A vision statement is a picture of how you would like the world to be. My 10-year vision is necessarily high-level and incomplete, but it may provide interesting food for thought as we consider the future of animals, their advocates, and the public’s awareness, attitudes, and behavior.

Where My Army At?

|
Is grassroots animal activism still relevant in the United States? Does a grassroots movement even exist anymore? For a cause like animal advocacy, which has yet to reach mainstream proportions, an "army" of committed volunteers is essential for positive momentum. For the animal protection movement to be successful in the long-term, we will need to rebuild our grassroots organizations and networks and develop closer relationships between local and national groups. Here are five ideas to do just that.

"The Seed Never Sees the Flower"

|
Take a look around: Despite decades, even centuries of work by advocates, people still have a long way to go on a variety of important issues like race, gender, poverty, etc. The same is true of animal advocacy, which by comparison is a relatively young cause. But in spite of the arguably slow progress of advancing the status of animals in today's society, there is reason for advocates to be optimistic.

Views on Animal Experimentation, 2007

|
by
The British public exhibits faith in certain aspects of the regulatory system for animal experimentation (i.e., the duty of inspectors to report misconduct). However, there is suspicion about other aspects of the, including conducting experiments without a license. The public is generally more accepting of animal experimentation if it serves human rather than environmental purposes, and the conditions of that support have not changed significantly since 2006.

Good Measures: New Approaches to Evaluation (audio/podcast)

|
by Stanford Social Innovation Review
In this panel discussion from the recent evaluation conference sponsored by Stanford Social Innovations Review and FSG Social Impact Advisors, Kriss Deiglmeier moderates a lively discussion on ways that funders and grantees can work together in order to effectively measure and improve the impact of their programs. Panelists include representatives from REDF and the Gates Foundation along with two nonprofit organizations.